Skip to content

Scale library · HRM & organizational behavior

Perceived CSR scale: Turker (2009)

Turker (2009) developed this scale for employees to rate their company's social responsibility towards four stakeholder groups: society and the environment, employees, customers and government. It was developed in Turkey and is now widely used in micro-CSR research, which looks at CSR from the employee's point of view. Schulze, Heinitz and Lorenz (2018) re-examined its factor structure in five samples from the US, Germany and India. It suits theses on CSR and employee engagement, commitment and green behavior, or CSR, reputation and firm performance.

Cite the original, not the blog.

Original English items

Items marked (R) are reverse-coded: recode them before computing reliability or scale scores. Replace bracketed placeholders such as [system] with the name of the system, brand or organization you study.

CSR to Social and Non-social Stakeholders (SOC, 7 items)

Code Item wording Reverse-coded
SOC1 Our company participates to the activities which aim to protect and improve the quality of the natural environment No
SOC2 Our company makes investments to create a better life for future generations No
SOC3 Our company implements special programs to minimize its negative impact on the natural environment. No
SOC4 Our company targets sustainable growth which considers the future generations. No
SOC5 Our company supports non-governmental organizations working in problematic areas. No
SOC6 Our company contributes to the campaigns and projects that promote the well-being of society No
SOC7 Our company encourages its employees to participate to the voluntary activities No

CSR to Employees (EMP, 5 items)

Code Item wording Reverse-coded
EMP1 Our company policies encourage the employees to develop their skills and careers No
EMP2 The management of our company primarily concerns with employees' needs and wants No
EMP3 Our company implements flexible policies to provide good work and life balance for its employees. No
EMP4 The managerial decisions related to the employees are usually fair. No
EMP5 Our company supports employees who want to acquire additional education. No

CSR to Customers (CUS, 3 items)

Code Item wording Reverse-coded
CUS1 Our company protects consumer rights beyond legal requirements. No
CUS2 Our company provides full and accurate information about its products or services to its customers. No
CUS3 Customer satisfaction is highly important for our company No

CSR to Government (GOV, 2 items)

Code Item wording Reverse-coded
GOV1 Our company always pays its taxes on a regular and continuing basis. No
GOV2 Our company complies with legal regulations completely and promptly. No

Response scale

5- or 7-point Likert scale (1 = Strongly disagree … 5 or 7 = Strongly agree). Schulze, Heinitz and Lorenz (2018) used 5 points; Nguyen et al. (2021) used a strongly disagree to strongly agree scale.

Licence and permission

The items are published in an academic article and reproduced in open-access articles; we found no specific terms of use from the author. Cite Turker (2009) and the article you took the wording from.

Sources (APA 7)

Vietnamese translation

A Vietnamese translation of every item, with sample-size advice and studies that used the scale, is on the Vietnamese page for this scale.

Back to all scales